<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Small Claims</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-305</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 12:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-305</guid>
		<description>Is 2% bringing out the minority vote in droves?

Exit polls found that blacks constituted 13 percent of the electorate, a 2 percentage-point gain over 2004

http://www.mlive.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2008/11/that_huge_voter_turnout_didnt.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is 2% bringing out the minority vote in droves?</p>
<p>Exit polls found that blacks constituted 13 percent of the electorate, a 2 percentage-point gain over 2004</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mlive.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2008/11/that_huge_voter_turnout_didnt.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mlive.com/us-politics/index.ssf/2008/11/that_huge_voter_turnout_didnt.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 00:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-302</guid>
		<description>The Bear,

I think that is exactly my point and I just didn't make it clear.  Saying Southerns vote for Republicans because they are Republicans and that's how they vote is circular logic.  They vote Republican today because the GOP is the more conservative party and a lot of racists identify themselves as Republicans for a variety of reasons.  I promise you that if the Republican Party embraces Affirmative Action and quotas, the South won't be voting Republican much longer.

I think 2012 could be really interesting.  Bobby Jindal could possibly be the GOP's candidate and he is a Punjabi Indian.  But he is also very conservative, he's actually Obama's doppelganger.  But you also have someone like Ron Paul, who is even more conservative and will not attract moderate voters.  Would the GOP run Jindal and have a Ross Perot type third party candidate run and skim votes?  Would Southern Republicans vote for a brown candidate?  I think that would be showcase how far we've come in terms of race relations than Obama winning Indiana, as positive as that may be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bear,</p>
<p>I think that is exactly my point and I just didn&#8217;t make it clear.  Saying Southerns vote for Republicans because they are Republicans and that&#8217;s how they vote is circular logic.  They vote Republican today because the GOP is the more conservative party and a lot of racists identify themselves as Republicans for a variety of reasons.  I promise you that if the Republican Party embraces Affirmative Action and quotas, the South won&#8217;t be voting Republican much longer.</p>
<p>I think 2012 could be really interesting.  Bobby Jindal could possibly be the GOP&#8217;s candidate and he is a Punjabi Indian.  But he is also very conservative, he&#8217;s actually Obama&#8217;s doppelganger.  But you also have someone like Ron Paul, who is even more conservative and will not attract moderate voters.  Would the GOP run Jindal and have a Ross Perot type third party candidate run and skim votes?  Would Southern Republicans vote for a brown candidate?  I think that would be showcase how far we&#8217;ve come in terms of race relations than Obama winning Indiana, as positive as that may be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bear</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-297</guid>
		<description>Joe, its important to remember that a larger percentage of rebubicans than democrats voted for for the 64 civil rights act than democrats. The democrats only came on board when thay needed the votes and did not have to deliver the goods. During the civil war it was the democrats who were all for peace even with slavery intact and the republicans who held the the hard line . Simple history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, its important to remember that a larger percentage of rebubicans than democrats voted for for the 64 civil rights act than democrats. The democrats only came on board when thay needed the votes and did not have to deliver the goods. During the civil war it was the democrats who were all for peace even with slavery intact and the republicans who held the the hard line . Simple history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-295</guid>
		<description>The Democratic Party had an extremely strong grip on the American South for almost a century.  After the Civil War, the South became extremely hateful towards the Republican Party and the "carpetbaggers" who were taking advantage of a devastated South and were forcing through civil rights for newly freed slaves.  So in the 19th century, it was actually completely reversed to what you see today and it wasn't until the mid 20th century where civil rights became the mantra of the Democratic Party that you saw a paradigm shift in the South.  Strom Thurmond, who ran on a segregationist platform in the 1940s, was originally a "Dixiecrat" (the nickname given to Southern Democrats) and he eventually switched party affiliations, as did much of the South, almost entirely due to the Civil Rights Movement.  If you remember, Thurmond holds the record for the longest continuous filibuster where he talked for something like 26 straight hours trying to block the passage of the Civil Rights Bill in 1964.  

Southerns felt abandoned by the Democratic Party and embraced the Republican Party in just the last few decades because of the Republican Party's spotty record on civil rights and race relations.  The reason the Democratic Party can count on 90% of the black population voting for them is because of the distrust the Black community has for the Republican Party and for good reason.  Men like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms have been the faces of the party for many years, they have opposed civil rights legislation and there have been countless racist Republicans who come front and center to speak their mind and sully the reputation of honest, non-racist Republicans.

They did a little piece on MSNBC concerning exit polling in North Carolina.  I believe they said 70% of white voters in North Carolina felt that race did play a role in their voting decision and 75% of those voters voted for McCain.  Now it is kind of amazing that 25% voted for Obama anyway but more than half of white North Carolinians felt race was an major issue and voted for the white candidate.  It's not a stereotype, it's hard facts.  The South loved the Democrats for a hundred years until they started getting into bed with African Americans. They switched party affiliations due to that issue and the Republicans lack of concern when it came to civil rights.  And the South today continues to vote Republican and you cannot divorce the racial history of the South from their allegiance to the Republican Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party had an extremely strong grip on the American South for almost a century.  After the Civil War, the South became extremely hateful towards the Republican Party and the &#8220;carpetbaggers&#8221; who were taking advantage of a devastated South and were forcing through civil rights for newly freed slaves.  So in the 19th century, it was actually completely reversed to what you see today and it wasn&#8217;t until the mid 20th century where civil rights became the mantra of the Democratic Party that you saw a paradigm shift in the South.  Strom Thurmond, who ran on a segregationist platform in the 1940s, was originally a &#8220;Dixiecrat&#8221; (the nickname given to Southern Democrats) and he eventually switched party affiliations, as did much of the South, almost entirely due to the Civil Rights Movement.  If you remember, Thurmond holds the record for the longest continuous filibuster where he talked for something like 26 straight hours trying to block the passage of the Civil Rights Bill in 1964.  </p>
<p>Southerns felt abandoned by the Democratic Party and embraced the Republican Party in just the last few decades because of the Republican Party&#8217;s spotty record on civil rights and race relations.  The reason the Democratic Party can count on 90% of the black population voting for them is because of the distrust the Black community has for the Republican Party and for good reason.  Men like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms have been the faces of the party for many years, they have opposed civil rights legislation and there have been countless racist Republicans who come front and center to speak their mind and sully the reputation of honest, non-racist Republicans.</p>
<p>They did a little piece on MSNBC concerning exit polling in North Carolina.  I believe they said 70% of white voters in North Carolina felt that race did play a role in their voting decision and 75% of those voters voted for McCain.  Now it is kind of amazing that 25% voted for Obama anyway but more than half of white North Carolinians felt race was an major issue and voted for the white candidate.  It&#8217;s not a stereotype, it&#8217;s hard facts.  The South loved the Democrats for a hundred years until they started getting into bed with African Americans. They switched party affiliations due to that issue and the Republicans lack of concern when it came to civil rights.  And the South today continues to vote Republican and you cannot divorce the racial history of the South from their allegiance to the Republican Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doode.</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>doode.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-293</guid>
		<description>you can't just assume that people in the south did not vote for him because he is part black.
 that is really stereotypical, the southern states are been STRONGLY REPUBLICAN, that is why the voted REPUBLICAN. 
not because barack obama is part black, because they always vote republican and they saw no reason to change that. Why on earth would you just assume that it is because southern people are racist that they didnt vote for the democratic party which they NEVER vote for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can&#8217;t just assume that people in the south did not vote for him because he is part black.<br />
 that is really stereotypical, the southern states are been STRONGLY REPUBLICAN, that is why the voted REPUBLICAN.<br />
not because barack obama is part black, because they always vote republican and they saw no reason to change that. Why on earth would you just assume that it is because southern people are racist that they didnt vote for the democratic party which they NEVER vote for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 22:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-292</guid>
		<description>I can't speak on specifically Southern states but Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight just posted a story how Obama outperformed Kerry in almost every demographic.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/obama-outperforms-kerry-among-virtually.html

Also, during the live broadcast on CNN, Jonathan King kept pointing out how Obama was outperforming Kerry in like every district he had shown.  The fact that Obama was able to carry Florida, North Carolina, Indiana (which has had a strong KKK history), and it looks like he is taking the Omaha vote as well.  

As for the popular vote, he is currently winning by roughly six percent (there are still some votes to be counted so I don't want to presume) but that is a fairly sizable victory.  Most of the polls going into Tuesday had him around 6-8 points so things went pretty much as expected.  I was a little disappointed that there wasn't thing insane groundswell of support that pollsters missed amongst young and newly registered voters but that was probably more optimism on my part.  

Certainly the laws trying to ban gay marriage are disheartening and disappointing but progress is being made.  Rome wasn't built in a day and right now we have a national government in place that may help lead a change in all areas of life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t speak on specifically Southern states but Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight just posted a story how Obama outperformed Kerry in almost every demographic.<br />
<a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/obama-outperforms-kerry-among-virtually.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/11/obama-outperforms-kerry-among-virtually.html</a></p>
<p>Also, during the live broadcast on CNN, Jonathan King kept pointing out how Obama was outperforming Kerry in like every district he had shown.  The fact that Obama was able to carry Florida, North Carolina, Indiana (which has had a strong KKK history), and it looks like he is taking the Omaha vote as well.  </p>
<p>As for the popular vote, he is currently winning by roughly six percent (there are still some votes to be counted so I don&#8217;t want to presume) but that is a fairly sizable victory.  Most of the polls going into Tuesday had him around 6-8 points so things went pretty much as expected.  I was a little disappointed that there wasn&#8217;t thing insane groundswell of support that pollsters missed amongst young and newly registered voters but that was probably more optimism on my part.  </p>
<p>Certainly the laws trying to ban gay marriage are disheartening and disappointing but progress is being made.  Rome wasn&#8217;t built in a day and right now we have a national government in place that may help lead a change in all areas of life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wellhonestlynow</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>
		<dc:creator>Wellhonestlynow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-291</guid>
		<description>WP 2.6.3 has been causing me some hell.  Be careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WP 2.6.3 has been causing me some hell.  Be careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 17:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-290</guid>
		<description>@HM

I honestly have no idea. They are not being deleted. I'm going to upgrade WordPress this weekend and see if that fixes it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@HM</p>
<p>I honestly have no idea. They are not being deleted. I&#8217;m going to upgrade WordPress this weekend and see if that fixes it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horse Marine</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Horse Marine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-289</guid>
		<description>Sasha, why are comments disappearing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sasha, why are comments disappearing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moodyblu263</title>
		<link>http://sashaisamonster.com/2008/11/small-claims/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>moodyblu263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sashaisamonster.com/?p=145#comment-288</guid>
		<description>well i am curious what the reaction is to the clan now that they have a silver tongued flim flam man running the country come jan1st 2009???
do you really believe he will help the economy,i think he will triple or even quadruple the aid to the congo and direct his attention only to the black race only,now i am not bias or prejudice,i just don't think its time to become the planet of the apes just yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i am curious what the reaction is to the clan now that they have a silver tongued flim flam man running the country come jan1st 2009???<br />
do you really believe he will help the economy,i think he will triple or even quadruple the aid to the congo and direct his attention only to the black race only,now i am not bias or prejudice,i just don&#8217;t think its time to become the planet of the apes just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

