Small Claims

Posted by – November 5, 2008

In April, I was sold a puppy by a store in Scottsdale. I named him Charlie. He was a Shih-Tzu and he was the most precious being on the planet. He was a clear channel of love, never far from the light of his Creator. Charlie, I found out soon after bringing him home, had parvo, and he died within a week and a half. I was devastated for a long time afterward. In some ways, I’m still healing. I still can’t bear to look at photos of him, and even writing this makes me cry. I loved Charlie very much, and every time I see a Shih-Tzu with that round, wide-eyed Charlie face, I get sad.

Under Arizona law, and under a separate contract they signed with me, the pet store was required to reimburse me for the purchase price of the pet. They had not done so, despite my repeated phone calls over the past six months, each one more emotionally draining for me than the last. Today, I filed a claim in small claims court against them. I’ve never prosecuted anyone for anything before, so this is a big deal for me. Normally I’m the kind of person who would rather just eat the financial loss than move forward with a confrontational and emotional battle like this, but these people must be held accountable. I am glad I have found the strength to take a stand.

Meanwhile, today, Barack Obama became the first black man to be elected President of the United States of America. His momentum brought out the minority vote in droves. These minorities came to vote for Barack, and they stayed to vote against gay rights. Gay marriage was banned in California, Arizona and Florida, and Arkansas passed a ban on gay couples adopting children. Exit polling indicated that minority voters were significantly less supportive of gay rights than white voters. The word “ironic” doesn’t embody enough actual ire to capture how I feel about this.

President-elect Obama took center stage in Chicago’s Grant Park and told the nation that “change has come to America.” News camera panned the faces of the tearful, multi-racial supporters, cheering in Chicago, cheering in San Francisco, cheering in Seattle and in Los Angeles and in New York City and in nations the world across. These people were elated with what, to them, is the realization of a dream of equal rights for all Americans. As they cheered, the votes that would deny basic human rights to a broad subset of the U.S. population were being counted in California and Arizona and Florida.

While Barack Obama easily won the Electoral College vote, he won the popular vote by a slim margin — around seven million votes. On a county-by-county basis, he performed far worse in the Southern states than John Kerry or Al Gore, despite his rags-to-riches story. These were votes about race.

The words that kept coming into my head were “small claims.”

These are small claims to equal rights that we are making today. That we have made with the election of Barack Obama. And they are only small claims. It is not finished. It is nowhere near finished.

  • Dan
    Is 2% bringing out the minority vote in droves?

    Exit polls found that blacks constituted 13 percent of the electorate, a 2 percentage-point gain over 2004

    http://www.mlive.com/us-politi...
  • Joe
    The Bear,

    I think that is exactly my point and I just didn't make it clear. Saying Southerns vote for Republicans because they are Republicans and that's how they vote is circular logic. They vote Republican today because the GOP is the more conservative party and a lot of racists identify themselves as Republicans for a variety of reasons. I promise you that if the Republican Party embraces Affirmative Action and quotas, the South won't be voting Republican much longer.

    I think 2012 could be really interesting. Bobby Jindal could possibly be the GOP's candidate and he is a Punjabi Indian. But he is also very conservative, he's actually Obama's doppelganger. But you also have someone like Ron Paul, who is even more conservative and will not attract moderate voters. Would the GOP run Jindal and have a Ross Perot type third party candidate run and skim votes? Would Southern Republicans vote for a brown candidate? I think that would be showcase how far we've come in terms of race relations than Obama winning Indiana, as positive as that may be.
  • The Bear
    Joe, its important to remember that a larger percentage of rebubicans than democrats voted for for the 64 civil rights act than democrats. The democrats only came on board when thay needed the votes and did not have to deliver the goods. During the civil war it was the democrats who were all for peace even with slavery intact and the republicans who held the the hard line . Simple history.
  • Joe
    The Democratic Party had an extremely strong grip on the American South for almost a century. After the Civil War, the South became extremely hateful towards the Republican Party and the "carpetbaggers" who were taking advantage of a devastated South and were forcing through civil rights for newly freed slaves. So in the 19th century, it was actually completely reversed to what you see today and it wasn't until the mid 20th century where civil rights became the mantra of the Democratic Party that you saw a paradigm shift in the South. Strom Thurmond, who ran on a segregationist platform in the 1940s, was originally a "Dixiecrat" (the nickname given to Southern Democrats) and he eventually switched party affiliations, as did much of the South, almost entirely due to the Civil Rights Movement. If you remember, Thurmond holds the record for the longest continuous filibuster where he talked for something like 26 straight hours trying to block the passage of the Civil Rights Bill in 1964.

    Southerns felt abandoned by the Democratic Party and embraced the Republican Party in just the last few decades because of the Republican Party's spotty record on civil rights and race relations. The reason the Democratic Party can count on 90% of the black population voting for them is because of the distrust the Black community has for the Republican Party and for good reason. Men like Strom Thurmond and Jesse Helms have been the faces of the party for many years, they have opposed civil rights legislation and there have been countless racist Republicans who come front and center to speak their mind and sully the reputation of honest, non-racist Republicans.

    They did a little piece on MSNBC concerning exit polling in North Carolina. I believe they said 70% of white voters in North Carolina felt that race did play a role in their voting decision and 75% of those voters voted for McCain. Now it is kind of amazing that 25% voted for Obama anyway but more than half of white North Carolinians felt race was an major issue and voted for the white candidate. It's not a stereotype, it's hard facts. The South loved the Democrats for a hundred years until they started getting into bed with African Americans. They switched party affiliations due to that issue and the Republicans lack of concern when it came to civil rights. And the South today continues to vote Republican and you cannot divorce the racial history of the South from their allegiance to the Republican Party.
  • doode.
    you can't just assume that people in the south did not vote for him because he is part black.
    that is really stereotypical, the southern states are been STRONGLY REPUBLICAN, that is why the voted REPUBLICAN.
    not because barack obama is part black, because they always vote republican and they saw no reason to change that. Why on earth would you just assume that it is because southern people are racist that they didnt vote for the democratic party which they NEVER vote for?
  • Joe
    I can't speak on specifically Southern states but Nate Silver at fivethirtyeight just posted a story how Obama outperformed Kerry in almost every demographic.
    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com...

    Also, during the live broadcast on CNN, Jonathan King kept pointing out how Obama was outperforming Kerry in like every district he had shown. The fact that Obama was able to carry Florida, North Carolina, Indiana (which has had a strong KKK history), and it looks like he is taking the Omaha vote as well.

    As for the popular vote, he is currently winning by roughly six percent (there are still some votes to be counted so I don't want to presume) but that is a fairly sizable victory. Most of the polls going into Tuesday had him around 6-8 points so things went pretty much as expected. I was a little disappointed that there wasn't thing insane groundswell of support that pollsters missed amongst young and newly registered voters but that was probably more optimism on my part.

    Certainly the laws trying to ban gay marriage are disheartening and disappointing but progress is being made. Rome wasn't built in a day and right now we have a national government in place that may help lead a change in all areas of life.
  • WP 2.6.3 has been causing me some hell. Be careful.
  • Horse Marine
    Sasha, why are comments disappearing?
  • moodyblu263
    well i am curious what the reaction is to the clan now that they have a silver tongued flim flam man running the country come jan1st 2009???
    do you really believe he will help the economy,i think he will triple or even quadruple the aid to the congo and direct his attention only to the black race only,now i am not bias or prejudice,i just don't think its time to become the planet of the apes just yet.
blog comments powered by Disqus